The Programme

The Digital Local Currency Programme

Banks in different countries, contracting directly, sharing retail infrastructure across a border.

Two banks in two countries each hold something the other needs. One holds local currency and domestic payment reach. The other holds the customer relationship and the regulatory standing that comes with it. Ordinarily they cannot combine those assets without a correspondent chain, bilateral compliance negotiation, and a cost structure that makes small retail transactions uneconomic.

For Afghan institutions the problem is sharper. Correspondent relationships have contracted steadily, and the cost of the ones that remain falls on exactly the transactions least able to bear it: small, frequent, retail transfers.

Syndication

A single bank rarely holds enough demand for a foreign currency to negotiate seriously over it. Its volume is marginal to the counterparty, so it accepts whatever terms the correspondent market offers, or it does not enter the corridor at all.

Under the Programme, banks in a market assess their collective demand and approach the destination together. What was marginal for each becomes material for the group. One agreement is negotiated on behalf of the syndicate, with a single sponsor bank in the destination country, and every member draws on it.

The sponsor bank gains predictable volume from counterparties that have already accepted a common compliance standard, rather than a series of small bilateral negotiations. The syndicate gains terms none of its members could have obtained alone.

Direct, and retail

The syndicate contracts with the sponsor bank itself. There is no correspondent chain, and none of the compliance cost each additional hop carries. What the sponsor bank shares is its retail infrastructure, so a user transacts on the same terms as a resident of that market rather than as a foreign remitter.

Three legs

  1. Buy

    A user purchases local currency through their existing home bank, instructing delivery into the destination jurisdiction. The home bank’s regulatory standing anchors the compliance position, and value is digital from inception with a complete audit trail available to both jurisdictions.

    Performed by a licensed institution in the origin jurisdiction.

  2. Keep

    The user holds a legitimate onshore account in the destination country, operated from their home application. Value sits inside the local economy, in sovereign currency, under local regulation.

    Custody sits with a licensed bank or e-money institution under its own permissions.

  3. Spend

    Onshore value connects to domestic payment systems, so the user transacts on the same terms as a resident.

    Performed by a licensed institution on the destination side.

Why it matters here

Afghanistan’s diaspora is among the largest in the region relative to population, and the value it sends home has historically moved through channels that leave no record. Moving that activity into a supervised digital channel produces an auditable trail where none existed, which is the argument the Programme puts to supervisors on both ends of a corridor.